History
AN AUSTRALIAN REPUBLIC

Outline of the Government's Proposal



RAC Reports

Outline of the Government's Proposal

On 7 June 1995, the Prime Minister announced the Commonwealth Government's proposals for an Australian Republic.

The Government's proposal is simply that Australia's Head of State should be an Australian citizen.

Because it involves a change to our Constitution, this proposal must be approved at a referendum - which means all Australians of voting age will have a say. For a referendum to be passed, a majority of Australians, including a majority in at least four of the States, have to vote for the proposition that in future Australia's Head of State will be an Australian.

This is an important issue for the nation, and the Government looks forward to hearing what Australians have to say about it. A referendum in 1998 or 1999 has been proposed to allow plenty of time to consider the issue.

If Australians vote in favour of the proposal, we will celebrate the centenary of our nationhood in 2001 as a republic.

What changes are involved?

The only real change involved in becoming a republic will be that an Australian citizen, rather than the British monarch, will be the Australian Head of State.

The Government proposes that an Australian republic retain the name 'Commonwealth of Australia' and that the Head of State be called 'President of the Commonwealth of Australia'.

If the Australian people decide upon a republic, the workings of Australian government will remain unchanged:

  • The people will still elect the members of Parliament and the Parliament will still make the laws.
  • The day-to-day handling of national government will remain with Ministers led by the Prime Minister.
  • Australia will remain a federation, and the States will be undiminished in status and powers.
  • Australia will remain a member of the Commonwealth of Nations.

Why introduce a republic?

Australia is one of the world's oldest democracies. We are approaching the centenary of our nationhood. The Commonwealth Government believes that our highest symbolic office should reflect this maturity and independence and be occupied by one of our own citizens.

The Government takes the view that only an Australian can really embody the things which unite us and for which we stand - Australian experience, Australian values and Australian aspirations. An Australian Head of State would also be a much more appropriate unifying symbol, and a much less remote one, for our culturally diverse population. When travelling abroad, an Australian President would promote Australia and Australia's interests, just as The Queen promotes the interests of the United Kingdom.

The establishment of an Australian republic would signal neither disrespect for The Queen nor lack of affection for the United Kingdom. It would rather recognise that our deepest respect and affection is reserved for Australia.

What functions would the President have?

The Government proposes that the President's functions essentially be those currently performed by the Governor-General as The Queen's representative.

Most of the President's duties would be symbolic and ceremonial. For example, he or she would award honours and medals and attend community functions, as the Governor-General does now.

The President would also perform the other formal duties currently performed by the Governor-General, such as appointing members of government bodies. Like the Governor-General, the President would follow the advice of the elected Government when doing this.

The President would also inherit from the Governor-General a small number of powers in the Constitution which he or she could exercise without advice from the government, or even against that advice. These powers, often called the 'reserve' powers, become important in times of constitutional crisis or uncertainty. On those very rare occasions, the President could act like a referee. For example, if a Prime Minister who had lost an election refused to resign, he or she could be dismissed by the President.

Under the Government's proposals, the Constitution would require that Australian Presidents be guided in their use of the reserve powers by the same unwritten conventions which have guided our Governors-General.

How would the President be chosen?

At present, The Queen follows the advice of the Prime Minister in appointing the Governor-General. The Government believes that if Australia becomes a republic, the President should be appointed by a two-thirds majority of a joint sitting of the two houses of the Federal Parliament. Such a parliamentary majority would require support from both the Government and the Opposition, ensuring that the successful candidate is non-partisan or 'above politics'.

The Government also proposes that the same non-partisan vote of a two-thirds majority of both houses should be the power capable of removing a President in the unlikely event of serious misconduct.

Why not elect the President?

In proposing the appointment of our Head of State by a two-thirds majority of the popularly elected national parliament, the Government seeks to preserve Australia's present system of government. At first glance, the popular election of the President seems a good idea - and a democratic one. But in practice, it would involve radical change and pose real difficulties.

In Australia's system of government, power is shared among the 147 men and women in the House of Representatives and the 76 members of the Senate. The Prime Minister and the Cabinet are not directly elected, but appointed by a majority of the governing party, and they can be dismissed by the governing party.

A popularly elected President would come to hold power far in excess of anyone else in our political system, including the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. It would seriously alter the balance on which Australia's Westminster-style system relies.

Popular election would almost certainly ensure that the President is a politician. Only the major political parties would have the organisation, expertise and resources to win a nationwide election. Many of our most eminent citizens would not offer themselves as candidates for President if they had to contest an election.

Who would be eligible to be President?

Under the Government's proposal, all Australians could aspire to be President and each President would be a person held in high regard by all Australians. The requirements for eligibility would be that the person to be appointed is an Australian citizen of voting age.

However, no serving politician would be eligible to be President, and Commonwealth, State and Territory politicians would not be able to become Head of State within five years of leaving Parliament.

The States

The Government's proposals do not affect the Constitutions of the States. If the Australian people voted for a republic at the national level, it would still be up to the States to decide how to appoint their local heads of state. However, the Government believes that if the Australian people as a whole vote for a republic, the States are likely to follow suit.

The way forward

The Government's proposal comes after careful consideration of the issues, including the report of the Republic Advisory Committee - a non-party report delivered by a group of eminent Australians who consulted widely around the country. There remains the need for wide community discussion before the question is put to the people, and the Government will be providing information, facilitating debate and listening to what Australians have to say.

Further information

The full text of the Prime Minister's speech and a summary of all the elements of the Government's proposal is available without charge through Commonwealth Government Bookshops.

site map | search | home | contact us
Australian Republican Movement 2001