|
ARM
Media Statement - 22 February 2002
The
Australian Republican Movement's statement regarding the Governor-General
The Chairman
of the Australian Republican Movement, Mr Greg Barns, today
released the following statement regarding the current constitutional
crisis.
"The ARM has never sought to personalise the issue of
constitutional reform. Neither do we seek to comment on the
particular difficulties surrounding Australia's Governor-General,
Dr Peter Hollingworth. Our focus is - and always has been
- on institutional reform.
"The current controversy illustrates once again the shortcomings
of Australia's current constitutional arrangements. The whole
situation surrounding Dr Hollingworth has demonstrated the
inadequacy of a system where only two people, the Australian
Prime Minister and the Queen of England, are empowered to
appoint and remove Australia's Governor-General. The Prime
Minister Mr Howard has made it clear in his statement this
afternoon that the decision not to terminate Dr Hollingworth's
appointment as Governor-General was his decision and his decision
alone.
"Plainly this is not good enough for a democratic country
like Australia at the dawn of the new century. An Australian
republic, by contrast, would offer Australians more say in
who is their Head of State."
The ARM recently released a discussion paper, 6 Models for
an Australian Republic, which details the appointment and
removal processes for various republican models. The selection
processes covered in the six options include Parliamentary
Appointment, Election through a Presidential Assembly and
Direct Election - all superior processes to the current system
which allows for one individual only, the Prime Minister,
to determine who the Governor-General is.
In five out of six models outlined in the ARM's discussion
paper, the removal process would be guided through the Commonwealth
Parliament, allowing for the voice of the Australian community
to be exercised through their elected representatives.
In the absence of any move towards significant constitutional
reform, Mr Barns called on the Commonwealth Government to
institute a more democratic and transparent system by which
the next Governor-General was appointed.
"Australians want more say in who sits at the apex of
our institutions. Every other position in this country is
filled through an open and democratic selection process -
why not the role of Governor-General? The next time Australia
is faced with the task of selecting a Governor-General, the
selection should be vetted by both Houses of Parliament. Such
a process would give the Australian people far more of a voice
than they currently experience." said Mr Barns.
Further
comment:
Greg
Barns, Chair, (02) 9267 8022
|