Speeches & articles
Our tolerant democracy is no place for a monarch
Article by Greg Barns
The Australian
, 13 December 2000

Greg Barns is the chairman of the Australian Republican Movement.


Did you know that the Queen we voted to keep last November owns all "unmarked and mute swans on open water"? And that, unlike us ordinary folk, she can sit behind the wheel of her Roller on any road without needing a driver's licence?

These bizarre facts about the wonderfully arcane and privileged life of our Lizzie emerged last week in Britain as The Guardian newspaper began its campaign for abolition of the British monarchy.

The Guardian listed 20 things only a monarch can do, and mute swans and unlicensed driving are right up there with the right to allow members of the royal household and chosen ministers to take a short cut across St James Park in an ivory carriage.

But The Guardian's republican drive is not simply about abolishing medieval and, in the case of driving without a licence, downright dangerous quirks. It's about highlighting why the monarchy has no place in a society such as Britain or Australia, where liberal principles of democracy, tolerance and equality underpin our communities.

That the British monarchy discriminates on religious and sex grounds is beyond question. Under the 1701 Act of Settlement, designed by William of Orange to prevent Scotland's Catholic king James II from bumping him off the English throne, no Catholic can become monarch.

It's that law which The Guardian is seeking to have overturned on the grounds that it offends the UK Human Rights Act. The newspaper has chosen Australian celebrity QC and republican Geoffrey Robertson to argue the case.

Ironically, Robertson will be in another constitutional monarchy shortly, Australia, for his annual summer holiday at Sydney's Palm Beach.

The Guardian's initiative has set the hares running in the British Parliament. But, under a typically undemocratic feature of the British monarchy, MPs are banned from discussing the royal household on the floor of the House of Commons. Mind you, this didn't stop Labour's Dennis Skinner shouting, as MPs were filing to the House of Lords to hear the annual Queen's speech: "Tell her to read The Guardian."

But most interesting from an Australian republican perspective were last week's Guardian-ICM poll findings on the issue. Given the paucity of debate about a republic in the UK, it is surprising that this poll revealed that 36 per cent of 18 to 24-year-olds want to see the end of the monarchy and 30 per cent of all voters at least want a referendum on the issue when Elizabeth dies or abdicates. Not a bad base from which to work if you are a republican in Britain.

Interestingly, it's in Scotland that the monarchy is more likely to topple first.

Tony Blair, a staunch monarchist (like many Third Way types, just a renovator and not a reformer) has created a Scottish Parliament. The strong feeling of independence and nationhood that this move has engendered is seeing more than 30 per cent of Scots, a record level of support, albeit from a low base, wanting to have their own head of state.

They've started down that path, with the Scottish Parliament passing a unanimous motion to abolish the Act of Settlement in December last year. If the Scottish Nationalist Party takes control of that parliament, which seems likely after the next election, then it will seek to negotiate from Westminster the right to allow Scots themselves to decide whether they want an English monarch.

As the republican behemoth emerges in the UK, in Jamaica and Barbados it's not only the poor state of West Indian cricket they are discussing but throwing off the last colonial shackle and becoming republics.

Both of these Caribbean nations are in the middle of constitutional reviews that are likely to see them emerge as republics in the new year. This will leave Australia as one of only 14 nations out of 54 members of the Commonwealth that still clutches to Mother England's apron strings.

As we enter the celebrations of the centenary of Federation, let's reflect on the fact that as Australians we still have one step to take – having our own head of state.

Hopefully developments in the land of our former colonial master and among our Commonwealth friends will make us get a move on.

Greg Barns is chairman of the Australian Republican Movement.

site map | search | home | contact us
Australian Republican Movement 2001