|
Summary:
Republican Perspective on the Governor General
John
Warhurst
Perspectives, ABC Radio National
7 May 2003
Transcript
of this program:
"Its
broke. So let's fix it". That statement refers
of course to the system
that produces Governors-General not to any one individual.
The
main concern of the Australian Republican Movement has
always been with the Office of Governor-General rather
than any one occupant of the
position. The goal of the ARM is to replace the British
monarchy and its
representative in Australia, the Governor-General, with
an Australian Head
of State in a new Australian republic.
There
is one misconception about republicans that must be
corrected
immediately. It is a myth that it is republicans who
have been behind the
current controversy surrounding Dr Hollingworth's fitness
for the position
of Governor-General. On the contrary, criticism of the
Governor-General is
widespread and would appear to be led mainly by those
concerned with child
abuse and separation of church and state. Republican
opinion merely
reflects a cross-section of the community, though republicans
naturally
share a particular interest in the position of Governor-General.
Republicans believe in Australian office-holders always
performing to the best of their abilities because they
represent Australians and their interests. I am personally
on the record, at the time of his appointment, saying
that it was in the interests of both monarchists and
republicans for Dr Hollingworth to perform well in the
position and, twelve months ago, I warned against any
rush to judgement against him.
Australian
republicans are concerned about the system rather than
the
individual. We recognise that the system is "broke".
It needs to be fixed and we want Australian political
leaders to look beyond this individual case and learn
the lessons it teaches us about the shortcomings of
our system. The situation has demonstrated the inadequacy
of a system in which only two people, the Prime Minister
and the Queen are empowered to appoint and remove Australia's
Governor-General, without any parliamentary debate or
public explanation or discussion. The system of appointment
involves the Prime Minister making a recommendation
to the Queen, who in turn is bound to accept the recommendation.
This system is foreign to Australia, closed to wider
scrutiny and unaccountable. Furthermore it invites party
politics about appointments because they are effectively
the gift of the Prime Minister alone, rather than being
bipartisan or non partisan. One benefit of the current
crisis for republicans is that more Australians will
become aware of how our system of appointing Governors-General
actually works. Surveys taken at the time of the 1999
republic referendum showed widespread ignorance of the
facts. This ignorance needs to be met with public education
and the current controversy is providing some.
Such
a system is plainly not good enough for a modern, independent
and
democratic country such as Australia. The solution to
a crisis in our constitutional arrangements should not
be subject to the personal and political judgements
of the Prime Minister alone. The system for appointing
and removing a Governor-General is undemocratic and
inadequate. The system is broken and it is time to fix
it.
An
Australian republic would offer Australians more say
in the appointment of their Head of State and would
greatly enhance his or her relationship with the Parliament
and with the Australian people. A clear majority of
Australians are concerned about the developing crisis.
They recognise that they need to be replaced by a more
open and accountable system in which they and/or their
elected representatives are involved.
When
Australia is next in a position when it has to select
a Governor-General, whether that is in weeks, months
or several years time we should do things differently.
Even before we become a republic changes can be made
in the method of selecting a Governor-General. The process
for both appointment and, where necessary, dismissal,
should be made more inclusive, and guidelines for evaluating
the behaviour of office-bearers should be introduced.
Whatever
the outcome of this current crisis now is the time for
the failings in the system to be addressed. We must
look to the future.
Guests
on this program:
John Warhurst
National Chairman
Australian Republican Movement
Producer:
Keri Phillips
|