Speeches & articles
A Constitution for the Future
Amanda Vanstone

Address by Senator Amanda Vanstone
Commonwealth Justice Minister

At the National Convention of Republicans
Saturday 6th February 1999, National Convention Centre, Canberra


It is one of my great hopes, that Australians, in November this year will confidently walk onto history's stage and boldly turn another page in our constitutional history. It's time to take another step in our nation's journey.

We moved from being colonies to a nation in 1901. We moved from being British subjects or aliens to Australian citizens in 1949. We now have the chance to move from having a British monarch as our Head of State to being an Australian republic in the year 2000.

We are, in reality, an independent nation. Our Constitution should reflect that fact. Our Head of State should be an Australian citizen . The Queen of Australia is Australian in name only. The Monarch lives in London, or Balmoral if it's summer, and to paraphrase a former Australian Prime Minister, is "British to the bootstraps", and always will be.

In November, Australians will have the opportunity to ensure our Head of State is an Australian Citizen. We should seize that opportunity. Our system of government has served us well. We have enjoyed peaceful, stable and democratic government. We will continue to enjoy peaceful, stable and democratic government under the proposed republican model.

We cannot discard our past. We should not seek to. Our history and cultural links with the United Kingdom will always be there. And many Australians, especially those who experienced the Second World War, will rightly continue to feel a deep affection for the United Kingdom and the British Royal Family.

But things have changed and we cannot turn our eyes from the present and future reality. Nearly a hundred years on from Federation we are a vastly different nation.

We, along with the U.S.A and Israel are one of the three great immigration experiments in the world. Just over 40% of our population are either first or second generation migrants. In percentage terms we have more people born overseas than the United States, Canada and New Zealand.

Over time, the fabric of our society has been continually strengthened and enriched by people arriving form all around the globe. Since the end of the Second World War, 5.7 million people have arrived on our shores.

National symbols are important, they should unite the nation, they should touch its heart. A British monarch as our symbolic Head of State no longer touches the heart of most Australians.

My first forbear to arrive on Australian soil was a carpenter who came from England with his family in 1838. The German strain followed in 1848 with a 57 year old adventurous hatmaker and his family, followed by an upholsterer in 1856 and a cabinet maker in 1877.

The Irish strain added an agricultural labourer in 1855, with the occupations of horsedealer, jockey and publican thrown in later. There's nothing elitist about that background.

All of these people from different backgrounds and homelands had one thing in common. They had the confidence to make a break with the past and the determination to move on and make a better life for themselves and their children.

We are a nation of people whose genes are loaded with that confidence and determination. In November I hope we use that confidence and determination to take another step in developing our national identity.

We are a very young nation in a very old country. White settlement just over 200 years ago has posed innumerable and no doubt many untold problems for indigenous Australians. The Western world has been extremely hazardous for indigenous culture everywhere. Maintaining identity in the face of the relentless march of Western civilisation is still extraordinarily difficult for some and has been impossible for others.

Over the same time, just as indigenous Australians have struggled with their identity, so newer Australians who left their homelands in search of a better life, left behind the daily reinforcement of their identity as Germans, Italians, Greeks, Chinese or whatever. They came to help build a new nation and a new identity.

In just over 200 years we have made enormous achievements. We have built a strong and vibrant nation. But our nation and our identity will continue to grow. The best of Australia lies not in the present or the past. The best of Australia is yet to come.

In November we can further strengthen our identity as a nation by choosing to have an Australian as our Head of State. We will strengthen our identity by having someone as our Head of State whose first and only allegiance is to Australia.

Under the Constitution our Parliamentarians are required to have sole allegiance to Australia. Yet the Australian Head of State clearly has multiple allegiances as Queen of Great Britain, Canada and Australia.

Monarchists who argue that the Governor-General is our Head of State are admitting that the symbol of monarchy no longer means anything to most Australians.

In November we will get a chance as a nation to take our destiny into our own hands.

It will be the people's choice.
It ought to be the people's debate.
The people must be engaged in the debate.
It must be an informed debate.

History's stage, however, works like a magnet to some and therein lies a potential problem for republicans. For this debate, republicans must put party politics and egos aside.

I hope we approach November with a spirit of enthusiasm for a system that gives us the opportunity to decide how we are to be governed. It is perhaps easy to take for granted the opportunity for involvement in the process of government. Some reflection on the limited opportunities others in the world have should re-awaken us to the reality of our good fortune.

Despite that good fortune, some Australians treat the opportunity to participate as a burden. The political process is not always held in high regard and current disenchantment with it has some consequences for the republican debate.

If the republican debate ends up being no more than a slanging match between two opposing views the public at large will not readily engage in the debate. What an irony if the debate to change the people's Constitution shuts the people out.

The proposed model has three great advantages. First, it was endorsed by the constitutional convention and thereby passed an early tough and fair test.

Second it provides incremental change. I know some would prefer more change, but small and steady steps provide a safe, sure pathway for our Constitution to advance.

And third, it gives Australians the opportunity for greater involvement in the selection of the Head of State than we have at the moment.

Our de jure Head of State is the British Monarch. The rules governing succession to the throne are in a British Act of Parliament. Australians have no say.

Our de facto Head of State, the Governor-General, is appointed by the Government of the day. There is no requirement for consultation or consensus. Ordinary Australians do not have a say.

By formally making a place for the people to nominate fellow Australians and by giving a much greater role to the Parliament in the selection of the Head of State, Australians will have a greater say than they do at the present.

I believe that every Australian child should be able to aspire to becoming Australia's Head of State. There should be no discriminatory constitutional or statutory limitation on that aspiration.

In summary, this debate is not about the past but about a Constitution for the future.

  • If you believe the British Monarchy is relevant to Australia today and will remain so in the future you should vote NO.

  • If you want a symbolic Head of State chosen by rules made by a British Parliament, vote NO.

  • If you want to strengthen our national identity, vote YES.

  • If you want our Constitution to reflect our place in the modern world, vote YES.

  • If you want an Australian Head of State vote YES.

Britain and Australia are inextricably linked by history and I'm sure that there will always be deep mutual affection between our two nations. But when we go to vote in November, I hope we remember that no British Monarch can, as Australians can, feel our dust or smell our eucalypt.

We are Australians. We must have an Australian Head of State. It's time to take one more step.

site map | search | home | contact us
Australian Republican Movement 2001